Comments on: South Korean K11 http://www.gunpundit.com/1338.php Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:58:11 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Kevin http://www.gunpundit.com/1338.php/comment-page-1#comment-6417 Kevin Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:28:04 +0000 http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1338#comment-6417 optics are big because it's multifunctional. night vision, thermal vision, range finder, time, airburst computer and more optics are big because it’s multifunctional. night vision,
thermal vision, range finder, time, airburst computer and
more

]]> By: Jay.Mac http://www.gunpundit.com/1338.php/comment-page-1#comment-2862 Jay.Mac Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:28:35 +0000 http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1338#comment-2862 If it's the same type as the OICW the optic includes a video camera, range finder/target designator and fire control computer which programs the 20mm round to detonate at a certain distance. http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:TiMAvpBRb3gJ:www.dtic.mil/ndia/gun/franc.pdf+oicw+optic&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=uk&client=firefox-a Check out the HK Pro page- the optic on the first firing model was half the size. http://www.hkpro.com/oicw.htm Why it needs a video camera built in I don't know. From the pic posted it seems that the big difference between the Korean and US version is that the K11 doesn't appear to be a "break apart" weapon. Looks like you can't ditch the 20mm component. That'll be handy when the guy carrying it has to go and clear a building. More images and video of it here- http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3421599&posted=1#post3421599 If it’s the same type as the OICW the optic includes a video camera, range finder/target designator and fire control computer which programs the 20mm round to detonate at a certain distance.

http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:TiMAvpBRb3gJ:www.dtic.mil/ndia/gun/franc.pdf+oicw+optic&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

Check out the HK Pro page- the optic on the first firing model was half the size.

http://www.hkpro.com/oicw.htm

Why it needs a video camera built in I don’t know.

From the pic posted it seems that the big difference between the Korean and US version is that the K11 doesn’t appear to be a “break apart” weapon. Looks like you can’t ditch the 20mm component. That’ll be handy when the guy carrying it has to go and clear a building.

More images and video of it here-

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3421599&posted=1#post3421599

]]> By: Takekaze http://www.gunpundit.com/1338.php/comment-page-1#comment-2833 Takekaze Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:37:34 +0000 http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1338#comment-2833 Knowing the South Koreans? They might field it this year. But I agree, the optics are nuts. Knowing the South Koreans? They might field it this year.

But I agree, the optics are nuts.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.gunpundit.com/1338.php/comment-page-1#comment-2830 Sebastian Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:50:31 +0000 http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1338#comment-2830 I'd hate to be the guy that has to lug that thing around. Why do they need to make the optics so large? They look bigger than even the original starlight scopes. I’d hate to be the guy that has to lug that thing around. Why do they need to make the optics so large? They look bigger than even the original starlight scopes.

]]>