<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army orders another 20,000 M9s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:11:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Those 20,000 M9 pistols are for Iraq Police</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Those 20,000 M9 pistols are for Iraq Police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>[...] week I noted a Strategy Page post on an order for 20,000 more M9 pistols for the US Army. The weapons are actually intended for the Iraqi police force, not our army. From [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week I noted a Strategy Page post on an order for 20,000 more M9 pistols for the US Army. The weapons are actually intended for the Iraqi police force, not our army. From [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>Skeptic:

That would have been me.  It always irks me when StrategyPage (and other blogs) fail to dig deeper than the contract announcement.  Most TACOM contract documents are available online to the public.  Even if you don&#039;t have the TACOM web page bookmarked, a simple Google search of the contract number should have pulled up a link to the .pdf file on their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeptic:</p>
<p>That would have been me.  It always irks me when StrategyPage (and other blogs) fail to dig deeper than the contract announcement.  Most TACOM contract documents are available online to the public.  Even if you don&#8217;t have the TACOM web page bookmarked, a simple Google search of the contract number should have pulled up a link to the .pdf file on their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebronze</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-2980</link>
		<dc:creator>thebronze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-2980</guid>
		<description>The M-9 sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M-9 sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Formerly known as Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-2975</link>
		<dc:creator>Formerly known as Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-2975</guid>
		<description>In the comments to that StrategyPage link, someone pointed out that the contract is for Foreign Military Sales.  Specifically, these are for Iraq.  Just another example of the Iraqis wanting what we have.  Chillax, OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comments to that StrategyPage link, someone pointed out that the contract is for Foreign Military Sales.  Specifically, these are for Iraq.  Just another example of the Iraqis wanting what we have.  Chillax, OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Army orders 20,000 more M9s &#8211; Call me Ahab</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Army orders 20,000 more M9s &#8211; Call me Ahab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>[...] Strategy Page via Gunpundit, the Army has gone ahead and procured 20k more M9 pistols for TACOM (Tank and Automotive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Strategy Page via Gunpundit, the Army has gone ahead and procured 20k more M9 pistols for TACOM (Tank and Automotive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasFred</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1414.php/comment-page-1#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1414#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>A good .45 or a Pimp gun... 

Lemme think... Hang on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good .45 or a Pimp gun&#8230; </p>
<p>Lemme think&#8230; Hang on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
