<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charter Arms&#8217; New Rimless Revolver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:10:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camping</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-6589</link>
		<dc:creator>Camping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-6589</guid>
		<description>Very neat post. I just became aware of your weblog and wished to say that I have genuinely enjoyed checking your blog articles. Naturally I&#039;ll be signing up to your information aggregator and I really hope you write again in the near future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very neat post. I just became aware of your weblog and wished to say that I have genuinely enjoyed checking your blog articles. Naturally I&#8217;ll be signing up to your information aggregator and I really hope you write again in the near future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry DeRooy SR.</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry DeRooy SR.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>My wife and I both have 32 mags!   We both love them and with perfect control of recoil.   My 32 mag is verry smooth and reliable, would,t part with it for anything.  If Charter arms can come up with a rimless 380, like my 32mag revolver 5 shot.   I would sure buy it in a heart beat.  Its nice to have a choise of different calbers  rimless revolers too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I both have 32 mags!   We both love them and with perfect control of recoil.   My 32 mag is verry smooth and reliable, would,t part with it for anything.  If Charter arms can come up with a rimless 380, like my 32mag revolver 5 shot.   I would sure buy it in a heart beat.  Its nice to have a choise of different calbers  rimless revolers too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-News on the Charter Arms Rimless Revolver</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-6214</link>
		<dc:creator>GunPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-News on the Charter Arms Rimless Revolver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-6214</guid>
		<description>[...] get quite a few requests for info on the Rimless Revolver, but there&#8217;s been little info to be shared. Maybe there&#8217;ll be good news at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get quite a few requests for info on the Rimless Revolver, but there&#8217;s been little info to be shared. Maybe there&#8217;ll be good news at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-5927</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-5927</guid>
		<description>10MM and .40S&amp;W in one package is more attractive to me. Shoulda gone that route Charter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10MM and .40S&amp;W in one package is more attractive to me. Shoulda gone that route Charter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butch</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>I would love one in 45acp.When will they be on the shelves forsale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love one in 45acp.When will they be on the shelves forsale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHRISH RATHI</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>SHRISH RATHI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>i would like to try one .40 it sounds amazing and great fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to try one .40 it sounds amazing and great fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lakshmi narasimhan</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>lakshmi narasimhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>i would like to go in for  a .40 on could u plz send in one piece to the below addres 329,4th c cross ,
&quot; ambika&quot;,3rd block,HRBR LAYOUT
&quot; bangalore 560043, karnataka  state, india</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would like to go in for  a .40 on could u plz send in one piece to the below addres 329,4th c cross ,<br />
&#8221; ambika&#8221;,3rd block,HRBR LAYOUT<br />
&#8221; bangalore 560043, karnataka  state, india</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardball</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4356</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4356</guid>
		<description>A 45 ACP for me with a 3&quot; or 3.5&quot; barrel.  Most fights are over in 2 or 3 shots and this pistol should be easy to carry.  Great for fun out at the range not having to chase brass and fun to shoot.  How about some lead heavy bullet rounds, 250 to 280 gr.? I&#039;ll bet it would digest them with no problem .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 45 ACP for me with a 3&#8243; or 3.5&#8243; barrel.  Most fights are over in 2 or 3 shots and this pistol should be easy to carry.  Great for fun out at the range not having to chase brass and fun to shoot.  How about some lead heavy bullet rounds, 250 to 280 gr.? I&#8217;ll bet it would digest them with no problem &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony B.</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>In response to &quot;meh&quot; Sep 26: it&#039;s worth noting that even though the gas leak is unavoidable, energy is not siphoned off to function a self loading mechanism and when comparing semi-auto barrel length with wheelguns, the measurement for SA includes the headspace length whereas wheelguns are measured at the actual barrel.  So these 2&quot; snubbies could effectively be similar to a semi-auto almost at 2.5&quot; depending on caliber.  In the end it may be similar in ballistic performance, but what you get is unquestionable reliability, caliber ubiquity, and depending on your carry rig a different balance of the loaded ammunition&#039;s weight (center of chassis rather than the frame).  More carry options are never a bad thing and besides, if this innovation for extracting rimless carts turns out solid, it&#039;s an excellent choice for carrying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to &#8220;meh&#8221; Sep 26: it&#8217;s worth noting that even though the gas leak is unavoidable, energy is not siphoned off to function a self loading mechanism and when comparing semi-auto barrel length with wheelguns, the measurement for SA includes the headspace length whereas wheelguns are measured at the actual barrel.  So these 2&#8243; snubbies could effectively be similar to a semi-auto almost at 2.5&#8243; depending on caliber.  In the end it may be similar in ballistic performance, but what you get is unquestionable reliability, caliber ubiquity, and depending on your carry rig a different balance of the loaded ammunition&#8217;s weight (center of chassis rather than the frame).  More carry options are never a bad thing and besides, if this innovation for extracting rimless carts turns out solid, it&#8217;s an excellent choice for carrying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1487.php/comment-page-1#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1487#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>Looking to purchase the 40 in 2.2&quot;.  I carry an XD 40.  A 40S&amp;W as a back up weapon will suit my needs just fine. The best of both worlds all at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking to purchase the 40 in 2.2&#8243;.  I carry an XD 40.  A 40S&amp;W as a back up weapon will suit my needs just fine. The best of both worlds all at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
