<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats buying more guns?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hampaiden Valkaisu</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/comment-page-1#comment-6723</link>
		<dc:creator>Hampaiden Valkaisu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1520#comment-6723</guid>
		<description>Guilty as charged :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty as charged <img src='http://www.gunpundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharpshooter</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/comment-page-1#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharpshooter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1520#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>EcoRover:

&quot;Heck, if Republicans &amp; the NRA would start supporting public land and wildlife management, I might join up.&quot;

Here&#039;s a good(if lengthy...about 23 pages the way I printed it) article by the late Michael Crichton about how well government has managed lands and wildlife.

http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-complexity.html

So what do you think is ogvernmetns motive for doing a good job managing ANYTHING?


Everytime we elect a Republican to represent Montana they try to sell off &amp; privatize the National Forest lands or some such anti-hunter nonsense.&quot;

Try as I might in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, I find nothing about managing land, wildlife, or anything else.

Of course, YOUR 2nd Amendment is precious, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EcoRover:</p>
<p>&#8220;Heck, if Republicans &amp; the NRA would start supporting public land and wildlife management, I might join up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good(if lengthy&#8230;about 23 pages the way I printed it) article by the late Michael Crichton about how well government has managed lands and wildlife.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-complexity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-complexity.html</a></p>
<p>So what do you think is ogvernmetns motive for doing a good job managing ANYTHING?</p>
<p>Everytime we elect a Republican to represent Montana they try to sell off &amp; privatize the National Forest lands or some such anti-hunter nonsense.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try as I might in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, I find nothing about managing land, wildlife, or anything else.</p>
<p>Of course, YOUR 2nd Amendment is precious, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/comment-page-1#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1520#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>First, I don&#039;t think anyone on the pro-gun side of the aisle is opposed to Democrats buying guns. We&#039;re all very glad to see it.

There is a certain amount of irony, of course, as the Democratic party leadership is and has been generally anti-gun and virtually all anti-gun types are Democrat/Liberal. 

That&#039;s what the gunbloggers are noting when we note these types of stories. It&#039;s not that it&#039;s shocking that Democrats buy guns. It&#039;s just that it helps prove our point that people want to exercise their rights, even those who (gasp!) stand with the Democrats.

Now, I suspect that the media&#039;s sudden excitement about the Dems Buying Guns story is based on shock that otherwise-sensible people would do something so illogical as buy firearms. The media is so totally out of touch with regular Americans in general and with gun owners specifically that it&#039;s rather amusing to see them wet themselves over Democrats buying guns.

When Republican/Conservative types come out in favor of gay rights or abortion, it&#039;s generally portrayed as a brave line-crossing maverick seeing the light. When a Democrat buys a gun it&#039;s astounding that reasonable people could do such a thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I don&#8217;t think anyone on the pro-gun side of the aisle is opposed to Democrats buying guns. We&#8217;re all very glad to see it.</p>
<p>There is a certain amount of irony, of course, as the Democratic party leadership is and has been generally anti-gun and virtually all anti-gun types are Democrat/Liberal. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what the gunbloggers are noting when we note these types of stories. It&#8217;s not that it&#8217;s shocking that Democrats buy guns. It&#8217;s just that it helps prove our point that people want to exercise their rights, even those who (gasp!) stand with the Democrats.</p>
<p>Now, I suspect that the media&#8217;s sudden excitement about the Dems Buying Guns story is based on shock that otherwise-sensible people would do something so illogical as buy firearms. The media is so totally out of touch with regular Americans in general and with gun owners specifically that it&#8217;s rather amusing to see them wet themselves over Democrats buying guns.</p>
<p>When Republican/Conservative types come out in favor of gay rights or abortion, it&#8217;s generally portrayed as a brave line-crossing maverick seeing the light. When a Democrat buys a gun it&#8217;s astounding that reasonable people could do such a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/comment-page-1#comment-3074</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1520#comment-3074</guid>
		<description>Guilty as charged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty as charged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoRover</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/1520.php/comment-page-1#comment-3069</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoRover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=1520#comment-3069</guid>
		<description>Oh come on, I&#039;m a Democrat &amp; been buyin&#039; (&amp; usin&#039;) guns for years... 

Practically everyone in Butte America is a Democrat, gun owner, and hunter.

Heck, if Republicans &amp; the NRA would start supporting public land and wildlife management, I might join up.

Everytime we elect a Republican to represent Montana they try to sell off &amp; privatize the National Forest lands or some such anti-hunter nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, I&#8217;m a Democrat &amp; been buyin&#8217; (&amp; usin&#8217;) guns for years&#8230; </p>
<p>Practically everyone in Butte America is a Democrat, gun owner, and hunter.</p>
<p>Heck, if Republicans &amp; the NRA would start supporting public land and wildlife management, I might join up.</p>
<p>Everytime we elect a Republican to represent Montana they try to sell off &amp; privatize the National Forest lands or some such anti-hunter nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
