<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M-16/M-4 in the NYT Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:19:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; M16 in the press</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; M16 in the press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>[...] Some news outlets are looking at the weapon&#8217;s reliability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some news outlets are looking at the weapon&#8217;s reliability. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5791</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5791</guid>
		<description>According to US Navy nomenclature standards (MIL-STD-1661), the spaces are used.  The official format is MARK (number) MOD (number).  However, the abbreviation MK is allowable in order to save space.  Using upper/lower case (Mark, Mk, Mod) is considered acceptable for technical writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to US Navy nomenclature standards (MIL-STD-1661), the spaces are used.  The official format is MARK (number) MOD (number).  However, the abbreviation MK is allowable in order to save space.  Using upper/lower case (Mark, Mk, Mod) is considered acceptable for technical writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5787</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5787</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Daniel E. Watters&lt;/b&gt;: Yeah. Those were in the linked article titles and I usually don&#039;t change those.

Question: I believe that the space in &quot;Mk 262&quot; is correct. Is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Daniel E. Watters</b>: Yeah. Those were in the linked article titles and I usually don&#8217;t change those.</p>
<p>Question: I believe that the space in &#8220;Mk 262&#8243; is correct. Is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5784</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Watters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5784</guid>
		<description>Nomenclature Pet Peeve:  There are no hyphens or spaces in US Army small arms designations.

Check Page 9 of MIL-STD-1464A.  You should be able to find it online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nomenclature Pet Peeve:  There are no hyphens or spaces in US Army small arms designations.</p>
<p>Check Page 9 of MIL-STD-1464A.  You should be able to find it online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murdoc Online &#187; M16 Reliability</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5783</link>
		<dc:creator>Murdoc Online &#187; M16 Reliability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5783</guid>
		<description>[...] from GunPundit.com U.S. Army Spc. Peter Hurlock qualifying with the M16 in Korea. April 14, 2009. (U.S. photo by Staff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from GunPundit.com U.S. Army Spc. Peter Hurlock qualifying with the M16 in Korea. April 14, 2009. (U.S. photo by Staff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/3803.php/comment-page-1#comment-5782</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=3803#comment-5782</guid>
		<description>When comparing the AR to the AK, &lt;a href=&quot;http://7.62x54r.net/MosinID/MosinHumor.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the obvious winner is the MN.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When comparing the AR to the AK, <a href="http://7.62x54r.net/MosinID/MosinHumor.htm" rel="nofollow">the obvious winner is the MN.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
