One of the few backwards states left

(Heh. “Left.”)

District Court Upholds Illinois Total Ban on Carrying Guns

The district court reasoned that even a total ban on carrying guns for self-defense outside the home should be judged under “intermediate scrutiny,” and the ban passes because “[t]he State of Illinois has determined that, for purposes of protection of its residents, a citizen’s interest in carrying a firearm in public should be subject to the governmental interest in safeguarding the welfare of the public at large from the inherent dangers in a loaded firearm.”

3 Responses to “One of the few backwards states left”

  • Ceefour:

    Of course the judges are right on this. Look how bad Chicago mwould be if every Tom Dick and Harry was carry a roscoe

  • carrying a firearm in public should be subject to the governmental interest in safeguarding the welfare of the public at large from the inherent dangers in a loaded firearm.

    …Does that mean the police should be disarmed? After all, if you’re going to protect he “public at large” from loaded guns…

  • Montjoie:

    “The State of Illinois has determined that, for purposes of protection of its residents, a citizen’s interest in [owning] a firearm should be subject to the governmental interest in safeguarding the welfare of the public at large from the inherent dangers in a loaded firearm.” Not much of a stretch, really, is it.

Blogads
ADVERTISE on Gun Blogs!



Military Hive Logo
Categories
Archives