<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Dawn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gunpundit.com/953.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/953.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:16:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim W</title>
		<link>http://www.gunpundit.com/953.php/comment-page-1#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gunpundit.com/?p=953#comment-1436</guid>
		<description>There was a collector&#039;s edition DVD? Do want. 

Today, with the soviet union dead and gone for nearly 20 years, it seems like a silly premise for a movie. But back in the 80s, it seemed much more plausible that the Soviets might kick our asses completely. We had a greatly inflated sense of their capabilities and their health as a nation. There was certainly a consensus at that time that the Soviet Union would be around forever, even amongst people who found that to be a bad thing. At least a few of my teachers thought very highly of the soviet union and seemed to welcome its inevitable victory over the unfairness of capitalism. Yeah, I grew up in NYC. 

I still think many of the fundamental assumptions of the movie resonate strongly with Americans, especially those that &quot;love their country but hate (or at least mistrust) their government.&quot; The movie touches on subjects such as gun control, legitimacy of governments, resistance against illegitimate governments (ie, occupying forces) and so on. Today&#039;s left finds that its position relative to the bitter clingers that populate &quot;flyover country&quot; is not much different from that of the soviet occupiers in the movie. They have a grand socialist vision for our future that we aren&#039;t interested in- we want them to leave us alone and let us rule ourselves in the manner we deem best- because &quot;we live here.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a collector&#8217;s edition DVD? Do want. </p>
<p>Today, with the soviet union dead and gone for nearly 20 years, it seems like a silly premise for a movie. But back in the 80s, it seemed much more plausible that the Soviets might kick our asses completely. We had a greatly inflated sense of their capabilities and their health as a nation. There was certainly a consensus at that time that the Soviet Union would be around forever, even amongst people who found that to be a bad thing. At least a few of my teachers thought very highly of the soviet union and seemed to welcome its inevitable victory over the unfairness of capitalism. Yeah, I grew up in NYC. </p>
<p>I still think many of the fundamental assumptions of the movie resonate strongly with Americans, especially those that &#8220;love their country but hate (or at least mistrust) their government.&#8221; The movie touches on subjects such as gun control, legitimacy of governments, resistance against illegitimate governments (ie, occupying forces) and so on. Today&#8217;s left finds that its position relative to the bitter clingers that populate &#8220;flyover country&#8221; is not much different from that of the soviet occupiers in the movie. They have a grand socialist vision for our future that we aren&#8217;t interested in- we want them to leave us alone and let us rule ourselves in the manner we deem best- because &#8220;we live here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
